-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
audit fixes #113
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
audit fixes #113
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
x/manifest/keeper/msg_server.go (1)
40-41
: Consider centralizing error definitionsWhile the error handling is correct, consider moving common error definitions to the
types
package for better maintainability and consistency. This would also make it easier to localize error messages in the future.Example approach:
// In types/errors.go +var ( + ErrInvalidBurnHeldMessage = sdkerrors.Register(ModuleName, 1, "invalid burn held message") + ErrInvalidAuthority = sdkerrors.Register(ModuleName, 2, "invalid authority; expected %s, got %s") +) // In this file -return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid burn held message: %w", err) +return nil, ErrInvalidBurnHeldMessage.Wrap(err)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
x/manifest/keeper/keeper.go
(0 hunks)x/manifest/keeper/msg_server.go
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- x/manifest/keeper/keeper.go
🔇 Additional comments (2)
x/manifest/keeper/msg_server.go (2)
39-42
: LGTM: Consistent validation pattern
The added validation step aligns well with the existing pattern in the Payout
method, improving code consistency and robustness.
39-42
: Verify consistent validation across message handlers
Let's ensure this audit fix pattern is applied consistently across all message handlers in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
The previous pattern might have been too specific. Let's try with a more general pattern to find message handlers and their validation patterns.
I need to see the actual message handler implementations to verify if the validation pattern is consistently applied across all handlers in the msg_server.go file.
Validation is consistently applied across message handlers
The validation pattern is correctly and consistently implemented across all message handlers in the module:
- Both
Payout
andBurnHeldBalance
handlers performreq.Validate()
checks - Both handlers follow the same error wrapping pattern with descriptive messages
- Both messages (
MsgPayout
andMsgBurnHeldBalance
) have their respectiveValidate()
methods defined in types/msgs.go
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other Msg handlers that might need similar validation
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($x msgServer) $METHOD(ctx context.Context, req *types.Msg$_) (*types.Msg$_Response, error) {
$$$
}'
# Look for any TODO or AUDIT comments that might need addressing
rg -i "todo|audit|fixme" "x/manifest/"
Length of output: 168
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different pattern to find message handlers
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($x msgServer) $_(goCtx context.Context, msg *types.$_) (*types.$_, error) {
$$$
}'
# Also search for Validate() calls to see the validation pattern
rg "Validate\(\)" "x/manifest/"
# Look for message handler files specifically
fd "msg_server.*\.go$"
Length of output: 1267
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the message handler implementations to see validation patterns
cat x/manifest/keeper/msg_server.go
Length of output: 1612
This reverts commit 64679f4.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #113 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 77.96% 77.99% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 33 33
Lines 2187 2190 +3
==========================================
+ Hits 1705 1708 +3
Misses 395 395
Partials 87 87 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes